To Franklyn, it was a courtesy meeting to let Portnoy know they were leaving while Cooper said she went in with an open mind. that document essentially pissed Dave off so much.”Īccording to Cooper, that’s when all negotiations stopped, but they continued to do the podcast as Nelson started shopping them around to other media companies.Īfter receiving other offers, the co-hosts met Portnoy on his roof-deck - but Cooper said they both went in with different goals. “Dave Portnoy essentially told us to go F ourselves in every single hole possible. (Franklyn and Nelson have not responded to The Post’s requests for comment.) Cooper also alleges that the 38-year-old Nelson then took the lead, drafting a list of demands the women sought from Barstool, which included a guarantee of $1 million each, a bigger piece of their merchandise revenue and giving them the intellectual property rights. During the first year with the sports-media behemoth, Cooper made $506,000 and Franklyn received $461,000, according to Portnoy.īut the blonde said Nelson kept chirping that they made “way below” the industry standard. In the 30-minute video, Cooper said the in-fighting started as they began renegotiating the second year of their three-year contract with Barstool Sports. “I’ll see you f - - kers on Wednesday,” she warned her “Daddy gang” at the end of the clip.
Call her daddy podcast hosts plus#
“The excitement I have, I wish Sofia had that day on Dave’s rooftop,” she said of the now infamous meeting, where Portnoy offered Cooper and Franklyn a sweetheart deal that would guarantee them a $500K base, plus incentives, and give them the “Call Her Daddy” intellectual property (IP). “I am so f - - king excited to get the show back on the air and continue to talk about the blow jobs and sh - - ty one-night stands,” Cooper said in her YouTube diatribe. The pair, who were originally squaring off with Barstool before turning on each other, haven’t recorded a podcast since early April.
“Call Her Daddy” co-host Alexandra Cooper took to YouTube late Friday night, announcing that she signed a solo deal with Barstool Sports to resume her smutty podcast and to tell her side of the split from her partner Sofia Franklyn.Ĭooper, 26, said Franklyn, 28, allowed her beau, HBO Sports executive Peter Nelson, and his “posse” of agents and lawyers to interfere in their business and come between the onetime best friends.
'F-king jerk': Dave Portnoy called 'rape apologist' as he records pizza review Listen to Portnoy explain the entire situation HERE including a deal he said he made them 3 weeks ago which guaranteed them $500,000 each and an early release from their contract.Derek Jeter reveals what he thought of The Post's 'Derek Eater' headlineīarstool Sports CEO steps down from WWE boardĭave Portnoy, Jason Whitlock trade barbs in ugly Twitter war And as the hosts started to shop their show around to others, so he threatened to sue them because they were still under a 3-year contract. A lot more.ĭuring the podcast Portnoy says he broke off negotiations, following the hosts’ demand for even more money, 50% of everything sold and the return of all intellectual property. The extra money came from the bonuses based on downloads, which were huge.
Portnoy goes on to say that Alexandra made over $500,000 after year one and Sofia made $460,000 so they were not getting dirt money as he puts it. He then received an e-mail from a lawyer asking for a new deal and the intellectual property issue came back up again.
The podcast is gigantic and Portnoy says he was more than happy to renegotiate. He goes on to say, after one year, he knew they wanted more money. At some point, Portnoy says, after about 6 months Alex asked for a raise and he gave it to her. The show launched and became an instant success. An agreement was signed where both hosts would be paid about $70K per year with bonuses based on downloads. Portnoy tells the story of how he found Alexandra on Instagram and after 6 to 8 meetings a 3-year deal was signed that included Barstool owning Call Her Daddy, including the intellectual property.
0 kommentar(er)
